https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:24226 Wed 23 Feb 2022 16:06:15 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:24185 Wed 11 Apr 2018 15:51:51 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:24180 Wed 11 Apr 2018 14:08:53 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:14828 Wed 11 Apr 2018 13:41:35 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:34072 12 months), and gender (narrative). Results A total of 57 included trials were identified from 5,984 records, with 49 contributing to meta-analyses. For all trials, resilience-focused interventions were effective relative to a control in reducing 4 of 7 outcomes: depressive symptoms, internalizing problems, externalizing problems, and general psychological distress. For child trials (meta-analyses for 6 outcomes), interventions were effective for anxiety symptoms and general psychological distress. For adolescent trials (meta-analyses for 5 outcomes), interventions were effective for internalizing problems. For short-term follow-up, interventions were effective for 2 of 7 outcomes: depressive symptoms and anxiety symptoms. For long-term follow-up (meta-analyses for 5 outcomes), interventions were effective for internalizing problems. Conclusion The findings may suggest most promise for using universal resilience-focused interventions at least for short-term reductions in depressive and anxiety symptoms for children and adolescents, particularly if a cognitive-behavioral therapy-based approach is used. The limited number of trials providing data amenable for meta-analysis for some outcomes and subgroups, the variability of interventions, study quality, and bias mean that it is not possible to draw more specific conclusions. Identifying what intervention qualities (such as number and type of protective factor) achieve the greatest positive effect per mental health problem outcome remains an important area for future research. Systematic review protocol and registration Systematic Review of Universal Resilience Interventions Targeting Child and Adolescent Mental Health in the School Setting; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0172-6; PROSPERO CRD42015025908.]]> Wed 06 Feb 2019 14:24:12 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:34048 Wed 04 Sep 2019 09:40:08 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:13833 Tue 24 Aug 2021 14:29:46 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:17268 Thu 16 Aug 2018 16:54:15 AEST ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:24222 Thu 03 Feb 2022 12:21:22 AEDT ]]> https://nova.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:46593 n = 54) of community-based substance use treatment services in one health district, Australia. Clinicians indicated their agreement with 10 attitudinal statements regarding their perceived role and self-efficacy in providing preventive care and perceptions of client interest in modifying behaviours. Logistic regression analyses examined the association between clinician attitudinal items and self-reported care provision. Results: Fifty-four clinicians (74%) agreed to participate. The most positive attitudes were preventive care being part of their role (100%), and they have the knowledge and skills to provide preventive care (100%). The least favourable attitude was clients were interested in changing their health risk behaviours (60%). Clinicians who reported that preventive care left little time to undertake acute care were more likely to assess for smoking (OR 8.06 [95% CI 1.31, 49.46]) and less likely to provide brief advice for all risks combined (OR 0.11 [95% CI 0.02, 0.63]). Discussion and Conclusions: Overall, clinicians reported positive attitudes regarding the preventive care provision for modifiable health risk behaviours in substance use treatment settings. Further research is required to investigate why, despite such positive attitudes, clinicians in substance use treatment settings do not routinely provide preventive care.]]> Fri 25 Nov 2022 15:06:10 AEDT ]]>